FireBoard
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
rdw blood How do I receive honest dental treatment? (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: rdw blood How do I receive honest dental treatment?
#15487
~Rita (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rdw blood How do I receive honest dental treatment?  
How do I receive honest dental treatment? As you know, I have been writing to my congress people requesting that a law be passed that would give me the right to my most effective antibiotics. I assumed that we all knew that Michigan doctors have been withholding antitumor/antiviral antibiotics for about 4 decades.  My husband was the victim of the withholding of the better antibiotics two decades ago.  Poor Hubby, he had two cancers (both appeared as tumors), and then a bacterial-produced heart disease, and still he, too, has chronic gum infections that remain improperly treated. The 1982 Oakland County hematologist was doing to antitumor antibiotics (Adriamycin and Bleomycin that reduced tumor size during the same day of treatment) what her piers (medical hierophants) had already done to the 1908 BCG tuberculosis vaccine. A century ago, the medical hierophants discovered that there was more money made studying bacterial damage than discovering a United States tuberculosis vaccine.  The tuberculosis-bacterial-infection called Lupus was the most visible.  So, withholding the better medicines was commonly done.  Thus when my husband became a medical victim in 1982, it appeared that the Oakland County hematologist was deliberately withholding the antitumor antibiotics Adriamycin and Bleomycin that was later used in 1983 after Hubby had changed doctors and hospitals. The time-zone of 1982-1983 was most famous for the withholding of antitumor/antiviral antibiotics and also that the medical hierophants lied about using tainted blood transfusions.  Thus when Hubby had his 2003 Cellulitis, friends and family would compare both Hubby's 2003 and his 1982 Cellulitis treatments. In 1983, after my husband had blood transfusions that left him with enough infection to disintegrate bones, my mother and I seemed to be the only two concerned family members.  In 1970, my mother's sister had died of Hodgkin's disease, and her body was given to the American Cancer Society for cancer research.  I had and still have poor English, but with mother's help, I wrote all over the world to find more information about blood. For a century, it was believed that bacterial infections produced tumors and probably caused some cancers.  Bacteria consumed everything, including cholesterol.  Recently there was a United States medical doctor on television proclaiming the right to withhold information.  Immediately, I wondered if medical doctors have been lying about bacterial infections, too. After all, for a century it's been known that treating the patient's symptom and not the bacterial-infection cause would make the drug prescriber more money. After watching an Oakland County hematologist deliberately withhold antitumor/antiviral antibiotics, I've been reading my own blood test.  I noticed that gum and teeth infections affected my blood!   Medical doctors would say So what , and not prescribe any antibiotics.  When the dentist prescribed antibiotics, it was always the same one!  I never had a problem with the Chicken Pox Virus until August 2002 and again on June 13, 2003. On August 19, 2002, Dentist Steven cleaned my teeth.  On August 23, 2002, I returned to the dentist with 3 painful spots on the lower right inside of my mouth.  My chin looked like poison ivy or impetigo.  Bacteria are common with dental work.  The dentist knew immediately that it was shingles and what caused it! I was in so much pain that on August 24, 2002, I went to a doctor. The condition wasn't getting better.  So on August 29, 2002; I drove to the Oakland County Health Department.  I had to keep taking pictures of my face to see if I was ever going to get better! I had decided to have one tooth pulled.  So in October 2002, I made an appointment with an oral surgeon.  After the appointment was made, I was told that I needed a referral.  So I returned to Dentist Steve for the referral.  The dentist wouldn't give a referral.  And he informed me that my husband's 1983 Hodgkin's disease was NOT caused by any mouth pathogens, and that Hubby's 1996 endocarditis was NOT caused by any mouth pathogens either. Needless to say, we had harsh words.  The dentist charged an office call for the NO referral, and I was left with several un-savable teeth! On March 14, 2003, I went to a nice new lady dentist named Jodie, and asked that my teeth be pulled.  The new dentist stated that only one tooth was un-savable and that it was infected.  I was surprised that the tooth was infected.  It didn't feel as if it were.  My (2002) Dentist Steve had been treating the un-savable tooth with Periostat for over a year.  Anyway, on March 14, 2003, the new dentist wrote an antibiotic pre_script_ion that was to be taken for a week.  The tooth wasn't to be pulled until two weeks had passed, leaving a week and the extraction with no pre_script_ion antibiotics! On March 28, 2003, I returned to the dentist to have the un-savable tooth pulled.  This time the dentist was a male named Jeff.  The tooth popped out with no problems.  Since my old dentist was treating several teeth with Periostat, I asked if I had more than one un-savable tooth.  The dentist replied: The other two teeth should tighten. So I asked about antibiotics, and the dentist reply was that no bacteria should be entering where the tooth was just extracted. Well, in May 2003, I had an infection next to one of the teeth that was supposed to tighten after the extraction.  The tooth that was supposed to tighten got a gum infection.  Then the gum above the infected tooth also infected.  It appeared as if the lower bacterial gum infection triggered an upper gum infection that appeared as a viral infection to the next dentist that I had gone too.  As soon as the upper viral-gum infection appeared, so did a second case of shingles appear on my birthday June 15, 2003! On June 16, 2003, I went to the doctor. Two vials of blood were drawn, and two pages of lab tests were returned, which were the following: Page 1 HEMATOLOGY - CHCC Results Test Name 2003-1998- (Personal Range)- Lab's Range-2003 WBC 7.4-8.4 - (6)- 4.8-10.8 X 10^3 RBC 4.75- 4.66 - (5)- 4.2-5.4 X 10^6 HGB 14.8 -14.8- (15)- 12-16 G/DL HCT 43.3- 43.7- (45)- 37-47% MCV 91.2- 93.7- (88)- 81-99 UM^3 MCH 31.2- 31.7- (30)- 27-31 PG MCHC 34.2- 33.8- (34)- 32-36 G/DL PLATELET 255- 242- (225)- 150-450 X 10^3 RDW - Not Done -12.9 (10) MONO 4- 5.5- (4)- 0-4% LYMPH 36- 36.2- (30)- 24-44% SEGS 56-Not Done- (59)- 36-66% BANDS 3-Not Done- (4) 5-11% EOSINOPHILS 1- 5.6 (1) No Lab Range Basophils -Not Done- 2.6- (.01) RBC MORPH Normal - Lab Range Normal Page 2 LIPID STUDIES CHOLESTEROL 152- 149- (160)- 120-200 MG/DL TRIGLYCERIDES 68- 77- (70)- 10-150 MG/DL HDL 27- 25- (55) Lab's Range 40-76 MG/DL LDL 111.4- 109- Lab's Range 80-100 MG/DL VLDL 13.6- 22- Lab's Range 10-40 MG/DL CHOL/HDL risk ratio 5.6- 6.0- Lab's Range 3.7-5.6 At the time of the 2003 blood tests, and with an existing health problem, my body temperature was 98.7. The temperature was only a slight increase. The doctor prescribed an antiviral drug for the virus. The drug had a 14-page write-up on the Internet that claimed that it didn't do anything. It worked like a placebo - a sugar pill. I assume that everyone knows that lab tests had an extremely large range, and that they were not personalized for each individual. Only the patient would take the time to create her/his personal blood test bible to notice abnormalities. Most noticeable was the Lab's High Range of 10.8 for the White Blood Cells (WBC). Normal for me would be 6, which would account for the slight temperature elevation. When I compared Hubby's 1982 blood tests, I noticed that he, too, had a normal WBC of 6. My husband's 1982 infection was permitted to flourish until the infection became strong enough to disintegrate bones in 1983. In 1982, Hubby's WBC was 10.4, and it was flagged as high because the Lab's Range had a high of 10. At that time, Hubby had a very large neck tumor, and then in 1983 two Henry Ford Hospital blood specialists told Hubby and I that the infection probably came from Hubby's gums! Friends have suggested that I go out-of-state if I wish to have my teeth pulled. What would you suggest doing? ~Rita
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#15488
BDK (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rdw blood How do I receive honest dental treatment?  
As you know, I have been writing to my congress people requesting that a law be passed that would give me the right to my most effective antibiotics. I assumed that we all knew that Michigan doctors have been withholding antitumor/antiviral antibiotics for about 4 decades.  My husband was the victim of the withholding of the better antibiotics two decades ago.  Poor Hubby, he had two cancers (both appeared as tumors), and then a bacterial-produced heart disease, and still he, too, has chronic gum infections that remain improperly treated. The 1982 Oakland County hematologist was doing to antitumor antibiotics (Adriamycin and Bleomycin that reduced tumor size during the same day of treatment) what her piers (medical hierophants) had already done to the 1908 BCG tuberculosis vaccine. A century ago, the medical hierophants discovered that there was more money made studying bacterial damage than discovering a United States tuberculosis vaccine.  The tuberculosis-bacterial-infection called Lupus was the most visible.  So, withholding the better medicines was commonly done.  Thus when my husband became a medical victim in 1982, it appeared that the Oakland County hematologist was deliberately withholding the antitumor antibiotics Adriamycin and Bleomycin that was later used in 1983 after Hubby had changed doctors and hospitals. The time-zone of 1982-1983 was most famous for the withholding of antitumor/antiviral antibiotics and also that the medical hierophants lied about using tainted blood transfusions.  Thus when Hubby had his 2003 Cellulitis, friends and family would compare both Hubby's 2003 and his 1982 Cellulitis treatments. In 1983, after my husband had blood transfusions that left him with enough infection to disintegrate bones, my mother and I seemed to be the only two concerned family members.  In 1970, my mother's sister had died of Hodgkin's disease, and her body was given to the American Cancer Society for cancer research.  I had and still have poor English, but with mother's help, I wrote all over the world to find more information about blood. For a century, it was believed that bacterial infections produced tumors and probably caused some cancers.  Bacteria consumed everything, including cholesterol.  Recently there was a United States medical doctor on television proclaiming the right to withhold information.  Immediately, I wondered if medical doctors have been lying about bacterial infections, too. After all, for a century it's been known that treating the patient's symptom and not the bacterial-infection cause would make the drug prescriber more money. After watching an Oakland County hematologist deliberately withhold antitumor/antiviral antibiotics, I've been reading my own blood test.  I noticed that gum and teeth infections affected my blood!   Medical doctors would say So what , and not prescribe any antibiotics.  When the dentist prescribed antibiotics, it was always the same one!  I never had a problem with the Chicken Pox Virus until August 2002 and again on June 13, 2003. On August 19, 2002, Dentist Steven cleaned my teeth.  On August 23, 2002, I returned to the dentist with 3 painful spots on the lower right inside of my mouth.  My chin looked like poison ivy or impetigo.  Bacteria are common with dental work.  The dentist knew immediately that it was shingles and what caused it! I was in so much pain that on August 24, 2002, I went to a doctor. The condition wasn't getting better.  So on August 29, 2002; I drove to the Oakland County Health Department.  I had to keep taking pictures of my face to see if I was ever going to get better! I had decided to have one tooth pulled.  So in October 2002, I made an appointment with an oral surgeon.  After the appointment was made, I was told that I needed a referral.  So I returned to Dentist Steve for the referral.  The dentist wouldn't give a referral.  And he informed me that my husband's 1983 Hodgkin's disease was NOT caused by any mouth pathogens, and that Hubby's 1996 endocarditis was NOT caused by any mouth pathogens either. Needless to say, we had harsh words.  The dentist charged an office call for the NO referral, and I was left with several un-savable teeth! On March 14, 2003, I went to a nice new lady dentist named Jodie, and asked that my teeth be pulled.  The new dentist stated that only one tooth was un-savable and that it was infected.  I was surprised that the tooth was infected.  It didn't feel as if it were.  My (2002) Dentist Steve had been treating the un-savable tooth with Periostat for over a year.  Anyway, on March 14, 2003, the new dentist wrote an antibiotic pre_script_ion that was to be taken for a week.  The tooth wasn't to be pulled until two weeks had passed, leaving a week and the extraction with no pre_script_ion antibiotics! On March 28, 2003, I returned to the dentist to have the un-savable tooth pulled.  This time the dentist was a male named Jeff.  The tooth popped out with no problems.  Since my old dentist was treating several teeth with Periostat, I asked if I had more than one un-savable tooth.  The dentist replied: The other two teeth should tighten. So I asked about antibiotics, and the dentist reply was that no bacteria should be entering where the tooth was just extracted. Well, in May 2003, I had an infection next to one of the teeth that was supposed to tighten after the extraction.  The tooth that was supposed to tighten got a gum infection.  Then the gum above the infected tooth also infected.  It appeared as if the lower bacterial gum infection triggered an upper gum infection that appeared as a viral infection to the next dentist that I had gone too.  As soon as the upper viral-gum infection appeared, so did a second case of shingles appear on my birthday June 15, 2003! On June 16, 2003, I went to the doctor. Two vials of blood were drawn, and two pages of lab tests were returned, which were the following: Page 1 HEMATOLOGY - CHCC Results Test Name 2003-1998- (Personal Range)- Lab's Range-2003 WBC 7.4-8.4 - (6)- 4.8-10.8 X 10^3 RBC 4.75- 4.66 - (5)- 4.2-5.4 X 10^6 HGB 14.8 -14.8- (15)- 12-16 G/DL HCT 43.3- 43.7- (45)- 37-47% MCV 91.2- 93.7- (88)- 81-99 UM^3 MCH 31.2- 31.7- (30)- 27-31 PG MCHC 34.2- 33.8- (34)- 32-36 G/DL PLATELET 255- 242- (225)- 150-450 X 10^3 RDW - Not Done -12.9 (10) MONO 4- 5.5- (4)- 0-4% LYMPH 36- 36.2- (30)- 24-44% SEGS 56-Not Done- (59)- 36-66% BANDS 3-Not Done- (4) 5-11% EOSINOPHILS 1- 5.6 (1) No Lab Range Basophils -Not Done- 2.6- (.01) RBC MORPH Normal - Lab Range Normal Page 2 LIPID STUDIES CHOLESTEROL 152- 149- (160)- 120-200 MG/DL TRIGLYCERIDES 68- 77- (70)- 10-150 MG/DL HDL 27- 25- (55) Lab's Range 40-76 MG/DL LDL 111.4- 109- Lab's Range 80-100 MG/DL VLDL 13.6- 22- Lab's Range 10-40 MG/DL CHOL/HDL risk ratio 5.6- 6.0- Lab's Range 3.7-5.6 At the time of the 2003 blood tests, and with an existing health problem, my body temperature was 98.7. The temperature was only a slight increase. The doctor prescribed an antiviral drug for the virus. The drug had a 14-page write-up on the Internet that claimed that it didn't do anything. It worked like a placebo - a sugar pill. I assume that everyone knows that lab tests had an extremely large range, and that they were not personalized for each individual. Only the patient would take the time to create her/his personal blood test bible to notice abnormalities. Most noticeable was the Lab's High Range of 10.8 for the White Blood Cells (WBC). Normal for me would be 6, which would account for the slight temperature elevation. When I compared Hubby's 1982 blood tests, I noticed that he, too, had a normal WBC of 6. My husband's 1982 infection was permitted to flourish until the infection became strong enough to disintegrate bones in 1983. In 1982, Hubby's WBC was 10.4, and it was flagged as high because the Lab's Range had a high of 10. At that time, Hubby had a very large neck tumor, and then in 1983 two Henry Ford Hospital blood specialists told Hubby and I that the infection probably came from Hubby's gums! Friends have suggested that I go out-of-state if I wish to have my teeth pulled. What would you suggest doing? ~Rita  Well, seeing a shrink might be a good move, you're totally whacked in the head!! In other words, you are a loon. I think the pathogens have been eating your brain for some time now... BDK
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#15489
Don (Visitor)
Click here to see the profile of this user
Birthdate:
rdw blood How do I receive honest dental treatment?  
~Rita
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop
902 903